Blog

Are you confused between using the REST architecture or the SOAP protocol to build your web services? Most developers have some idea about Representational State Transfer (REST), because it is a newer technology and is leaner and simpler in design when compared to the SOAP architecture. But does that mean it is the obvious choice for your web services?

The answer is: it depends. There are some strong advantages that come with using the SOAP architecture that might surprise you. Let us go through some key design characteristics of both approaches to help you make a better call.

Sending and Receiving Messages

A common analogy compares the messaging design of SOAP and REST to an envelope and a postcard, respectively. SOAP uses an XML-based envelope design that wraps requests and responses in a structured format, whereas REST messages are more lightweight and open—like a postcard.

Security

Both SOAP and REST support SSL for secure communication. However, SOAP has a distinct advantage with WS-Security, a built-in standard that provides enterprise-grade security features including message-level encryption, digital signatures, and security tokens. This means SOAP can secure messages independently of the transport layer.

REST relies primarily on HTTPS and SSL for transport-level security. For additional security requirements, REST APIs typically need custom implementations. SOAP’s use of WSDL (Web Service Definition Language) also provides a formal contract that helps enforce security and compatibility between services.

Stateful vs. Stateless Design

SOAP supports both stateful and stateless operations. In a stateful design, the server retains information from a client across multiple requests, which is useful for complex transactions that span several steps.

REST, on the other hand, adheres strictly to a stateless design. Each request from a client must contain all the information the server needs to process it. No session data is stored on the server between requests. This stateless approach reduces server load and makes REST services easier to scale and cache.

Error Handling and Retry Logic

SOAP includes a built-in fault element for standardized error reporting. When something goes wrong, SOAP returns a structured fault message that contains an error code, a description, and details about what caused the failure. This makes error handling predictable and consistent across different implementations.

REST uses standard HTTP status codes (such as 404 for Not Found, 500 for Server Error) for error handling. While this is simpler, it may require additional custom implementation for detailed error reporting.

Advantages of REST over SOAP

By now, you have probably noticed that SOAP offers robust, enterprise-grade features. So why do so many modern APIs use REST? Here are the key advantages REST offers:

Multiple data formats: REST supports XML, JSON, CSV, RSS, and other formats. SOAP only supports XML. JSON in particular is lightweight and widely used in modern web and mobile applications.

Better performance: SOAP’s XML messages carry significant overhead due to the envelope structure. REST messages, especially when using JSON, are much smaller and faster to parse.

Built-in caching: REST leverages HTTP caching mechanisms, allowing responses to be cached for improved performance. SOAP messages are typically not cacheable due to their POST-based design.

Key Takeaways

Feature	SOAP	REST
Supported Formats	XML only	XML, JSON, CSV, RSS, and more
Security	WS-Security, HTTPS, SSL	HTTPS and SSL
Performance	Heavier due to XML envelope	Lightweight and faster
Transport Protocols	HTTP/HTTPS, FTP, SMTP, XMPP	HTTP/HTTPS
Design Complexity	More complex, feature-rich	Simpler, easier to implement
State Management	Stateful or Stateless	Stateless only

Have you ever wondered why blockchain technologies are creating such a buzz nowadays?

Until recently, we have always entrusted central authorities such as banks, governments, and private corporations with maintaining and managing our transactions. However, with the emergence of blockchain, we are now compelled to consider an alternate approach of managing information and transactional values. As the name suggests, blockchain technologies use a sequence, or chain, of blocks to update transactions in a distributed and decentralized manner.

The Sequence of the Chain

The first block of the chain is called the genesis block. Each block contains information about transactions, and as more transactions occur, subsequent blocks are added to the chain to form an open ledger. Instead of a central authority, a large number of smaller entities, called miners, validate the sequence of the data.

Each block also contains a hash value of the previous block of information. The hash value is like a fingerprint of the previous block, and the sequence of the hash chain can authenticate the information in each preceding block.

How Blocks Are Added to the Chain

A Proof-of-Work (PoW) system is used to select which miner adds the next block to the chain, and ensures that the selection of miners is random and unbiased. Miners compete with each other to solve complex and computationally intensive mathematical problems. Here is how the process works:

Step 1: Generating the Proof of Work

The system provides a computational problem to the community of miners. Each miner races to find a solution, using processing power to work through the mathematical challenge. The system assigns each transaction a unique digital fingerprint.

Step 2: Communicating the Solution

The first miner to arrive at the solution announces it to other miners, along with the identification of all related transaction information.

Step 3: Validation and Verification by Majority

Other miners in the network verify the proposed solution and the associated transaction data. A consensus is reached when the majority of miners confirm the solution is correct.

Step 4: Updating the Blockchain

Once verified, the new block containing the documented transaction information is added to the blockchain. This block is now part of the permanent, distributed ledger.

Step 5: Rewarding the Miner

The winning miner receives a block reward (newly created cryptocurrency) and transaction fees as compensation for their computational effort. This incentive structure keeps miners motivated to participate in securing the network.

Today, third-world countries like India, China, the Philippines, and many others lie at the brink of change. Their abundant human resource that has been an economic deterrent in the past has the potential to usher in revenue. But, the question remains—how do you train an employable skill to such a large population of mostly illiterate people without breaking the bank?

Virtual Reality (VR) education offers a revolutionary solution to this challenge. By providing immersive, hands-on training experiences, VR can help bridge the skills gap in developing nations without the need for expensive physical infrastructure.

“Young people from the poorest 20% of households are almost six times as likely to be unable to read like those from the richest 20% of households.” (Source: GEM Report, Policy Paper 20, p. 7).

We might have an answer with Virtual reality (VR)–a three-dimensional, computer-generated representation of physical worlds. VR is a promising option for training and development in third-world countries, and here is why:

Language independent:

VR involves training via experience and is independent of any language barriers. For example, a county like India where a total of 22 major languages and 720 dialects are spoken. VR is the only medium by which you can train people from all backgrounds using a single experiential training program for all languages.

Emotionally-charged learning experiences:

Because VR is so immersive and compelling, learners absorb information faster and retain what they have learned for more extended periods. Memory formation is directly linked to emotional responses, and VR is an emotionally-charged experience.

Training the masses:

VR is a vital tool for conducting training without worrying about real-world consequences. For example, health care organizations are increasingly using VR to train surgeons on new techniques in a risk-free environment. Imagine replicating the health care model in other professions that involve sensitive or critical operations. Besides initial training and orientation programs, VR can sharpen the skills of workers with difficult jobs without worrying about real-world consequences.

Cost-effective technology:

The cost of VR technology has significantly reduced in recent years. You can now send pre-loaded VR headsets with training experiences to remote field locations instead of the costlier option of deploying training personnel.

A well-designed VR training program can help you churn out skilled pilots, drivers, and trained workers in almost any employable skill.